Warning: Use of undefined constant KT_BSEO - assumed 'KT_BSEO' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/46/d347802020/htdocs/los-angeles-dentist-blog/wp-content/plugins/keyword-tag-wrapper/keyword-tagger-bseo.php on line 10

Warning: Use of undefined constant KT_BSEO_DB_VERSION - assumed 'KT_BSEO_DB_VERSION' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/46/d347802020/htdocs/los-angeles-dentist-blog/wp-content/plugins/keyword-tag-wrapper/keyword-tagger-bseo.php on line 11

Warning: Use of undefined constant wp_cumulus_widget - assumed 'wp_cumulus_widget' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/46/d347802020/htdocs/los-angeles-dentist-blog/wp-content/plugins/wp-cumulus/wp-cumulus.php on line 375
Board of Supervisors takes next step toward fluoridating county water | Dentist Beverly Hills, Dentist Los Angeles
Dentist Los Angeles | Dentist Beverly Hills | General Dentist | Cosmetic Dentist | Dental Implant | Dental Office



Board of Supervisors takes subsequent step toward fluoridating county water

Posted by Z Dental Group - February 27th, 2013

Dentists and other health caring professionals, along with a larger, some-more outspoken fortuitous of fluoride skeptics, packaged house chambers for a marathon five-hour open hearing.

Despite reservations voiced by some supervisors, a house unanimously certified additional financial research and engineering studies of adding fluoride to many of a county’s celebration water. The final preference is not approaching until Mar 2014.

“We can’t omit a information and a statistics in this county when it comes to a oral health epidemic,” Supervisor Efren Carrillo said.

Dozens of speakers, however, voiced annoy and dismay over a proposal, citing health concerns, dread of mainstream scholarship and doubts about how a county would be means to account a project.

Based on rough estimates, a plan could cost adult to $8.5 million in collateral upgrades to a county’s executive H2O system, and ongoing maintain starting during $973,000 a year, according to a county report.

“I’m presumption this will be required since a roads will be so bad we won’t be means to expostulate to a dentist,” pronounced Elizabeth Van Dyke of Guerneville, in what became a repeated thesis about a county’s spending priorities.

Fluoride is a chemical devalue and was introduced to U.S. celebration H2O scarcely 70 years ago. About three-quarters of a nation’s race served by open H2O systems, or about 196 million people, are now receiving fluoridated water.

The magnitude is corroborated by a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a surgeon general, a World Health Organization and a American Dental Association, that called it “the singular many effective open health magnitude to forestall dental decay.”

Currently in Sonoma County, a usually fluoridated H2O is delivered to residents of Healdsburg, a adjacent Fitch Mountain area and Two Rock Coast Guard Base.

Dr. Lynn Silver Chalfin, a county’s health officer, told a house that in Sonoma County each day, 10 to 12 children bear ubiquitous anesthesia while being treated for serious dental disease.

She cited a CDC investigate that found that for each dollar spent on village H2O fluoridation, a outcome is a $38 assets on dental expenses.

Stacey Stirling, dental operations manager for St. Joseph Health Sonoma County, described a 5-year-old lady whose face was so distended since of oral illness her eyes were scarcely shut.

Stirling pronounced a girl’s relatives brought her to a puncture room and that she spent 5 days in a hospital. The sum check for her dental care: $80,000.

“We see children like this each day,” Stirling said. “My fear is that we’re going to see a genocide in Sonoma County, for those children who don’t make it in in time.”

Santa Rosa dentist Anthony Fernandez, a proponent of fluoride as a surety measure, pronounced a slightest costly stuffing he offers is $160. He urged supervisors to “do a right thing,” and for thespian effect, he played a biting sound of a dentist’s cavalcade on a open residence complement around his smartphone.

Opponents were not amused. Several speakers likened fluoride to a poisonous piece they pronounced can means a operation of health ailments when ingested, all from bone cancer to hip fractures.

“You’re listening to members of a dental organisation that gave us mercury,” Dr. Robert Rowen, who has an unifying and nutritive family medicine use in Santa Rosa, told a board.

He pronounced if he were to allot drugs a approach he pronounced supervisors are radically deliberation with mass fluoridation, a medical investiture would “jerk my ticket,” definition frame him of his looseness to practice.

Several speakers pronounced county health officials should combine their efforts instead on removing children weaned off of sugarine and soda drinks.

They also lifted a emanate of people holding personal shortcoming to learn their children good oral-hygiene habits.

The dissenters clearly got to Supervisor Shirlee Zane, who pronounced after some-more than dual hours of open testimony, “We are so behind a bend here. Shame on us for being so distant behind.”

She afterwards forked her finger toward a assembly and said, “I have listened to you. You will now listen to me.”

That stirred Brenda Adelman, a Guerneville proprietor and longtime romantic on Russian River H2O issues, to mount adult and scream aloud behind during Zane, “Please don’t indicate your finger during me. That’s clearly obnoxious.”

Supervisor David Rabbitt, a authority of a board, battered a gavel several times seeking order.

“I’m not going on until they stop,” Zane said.

The fluoridation plan would impact 3 buliding of a county, including 350,000 residents served by a Sonoma County Water Agency in Windsor, Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, Cotati, Petaluma, Sonoma, Forestville and a Valley of a Moon. More than 50,000 Novato-area residents served by a Water Agency also would get fluoridated H2O for a initial time.

Perhaps a biggest jump to a county’s skeleton is that it would need a unanimous agree of all 8 of a H2O agency’s retailers.

Rabbitt cautioned that a final time those agreements were non-stop adult for examination it took “eight-and-a-half years to bottle it adult again.”

The Graton Community Services District is not one of a vital metropolitan systems that receives H2O from a H2O agency. But Robert Rawson, a district’s ubiquitous manager, pronounced a district opposes a fluoride plan since he pronounced a chemical will means environmental damage, including to nautical organisms.

Rabbitt and Supervisor Susan Gorin voiced concerns about how a plan would be saved and, also, over how most income a county is spending on studies. The engineering research authorized Tuesday is estimated to cost a county about $103,000.

At doubt from Gorin, County Counsel Bruce Goldstein pronounced a cost of a flouride plan could be upheld on to ratepayers.

Gorin pronounced she also was “conflicted” about putting fluoride in water, observant she’s not awaiting it to lead to “miraculous cures, generally among a disadvantaged population.”

Shared Post

    Tags: ,

    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Blog Home